Exit
Toggle navigation
Database
Database
View
View
Back to list
Export
Export to Pdf
Export to Excel
Export to Word
Export to Xml
Export to Csv
Print
Entry Date
2023-07-22
Source
Mant J. Process versus outcome indicators in the assessment of quality of health care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2001;13(6):475.
Link
Link
Source Type
Theory /Hypothesis
Domain
Groups
Subdomain1
Organisations - hospitals
Subdomain2
Outcomes
Key Points
In comparisons of performance between clinical services it is natural and entirely justified to pay most attention to outcomes such as mortality in heart disease. The problem with this however is that adverse outcome are relatively rare which means that very large numbers of cases must be collected before valid comparisons can be made. Also final outcomes are sensitive to other variables such as demographic and casemix severity. Comparisons of the processes of care, provided these are of evidence based efficacy, can be made much more quickly as they are or should be used in all cases thus giving larger numbers as denominators. They are also not subject to casemix and other environmental confounding factors.
Citns
749
Back to list
Export
Export to Pdf
Export to Excel
Export to Word
Export to Xml
Export to Csv
Print
×
Change your password
Change password for user '
'
Current password
New password
Confirm password
Passwords do not match. Please try again.